#getmoneyout - We all have a serious problem when the rich use their money to buy government. But if the up coming Supreme Court case McCutcheon vs FEC that threatens to make the political system even more corruption if the judges rules in favor of McCutcheon. 
The Supreme Court is on the brink of doubling down on the Citizens United decision’s shameful legacy. If the Court sides with the plantiff in McCutcheon v. FEC and overturns aggregate contribution limits, a single indivudual could spend as much as $3.6 million on a single election — enough to buy the attention of the President and every single member of Congress. 
Our current contribution limits don’t threaten anyone’s speech; today’s donors can give over $120,000, more than twice what the average American family makes in a year. McCutcheon would add to a string of rulings that have enabled a few wealthy superdonors to buy as much influence as they can afford — shutting the rest of us out in the process. 
A bad decision in McCutcheon would put the court’s seal of approval on a system on a system of legalized bribery. It would underscore the compelling case for a constitutional amendment making it clear that Congress and the states can limit campaign spending. 
Source: Common Cause

#getmoneyout - We all have a serious problem when the rich use their money to buy government. But if the up coming Supreme Court case McCutcheon vs FEC that threatens to make the political system even more corruption if the judges rules in favor of McCutcheon.

The Supreme Court is on the brink of doubling down on the Citizens United decision’s shameful legacy. If the Court sides with the plantiff in McCutcheon v. FEC and overturns aggregate contribution limits, a single indivudual could spend as much as $3.6 million on a single election — enough to buy the attention of the President and every single member of Congress.

Our current contribution limits don’t threaten anyone’s speech; today’s donors can give over $120,000, more than twice what the average American family makes in a year. McCutcheon would add to a string of rulings that have enabled a few wealthy superdonors to buy as much influence as they can afford — shutting the rest of us out in the process.

A bad decision in McCutcheon would put the court’s seal of approval on a system on a system of legalized bribery. It would underscore the compelling case for a constitutional amendment making it clear that Congress and the states can limit campaign spending.

Source: Common Cause


Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus

Notes

  1. schizoape reblogged this from occupywatchdog
  2. paszmina reblogged this from occupywatchdog
  3. littleleeny reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  4. ocoolstorybro reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  5. a-beanr reblogged this from caramelwinter
  6. shinigami-danna reblogged this from noticedkouhai
  7. ginsegn reblogged this from bertholdtfubarvevo
  8. noticedkouhai reblogged this from bertholdtfubarvevo
  9. bertholdtfubarvevo reblogged this from caramelwinter
  10. caramelwinter reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  11. missfluffernutter reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  12. i-dont-need-anyone-now reblogged this from nommunism
  13. dermoosealini reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  14. kp777 reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  15. bandmail reblogged this from thequeenandthephoenix
  16. oldparasitesingle reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  17. beardoforange reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  18. marcohasamagicaltongue reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  19. thequeenandthephoenix reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  20. thecallgirlofcthulhu reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  21. satanic-capitalist reblogged this from occupywatchdog and added:
    This sums up my whole blog
  22. zookmurnig reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  23. amaranthineinadream reblogged this from cuntwarrior