#getmoneyout - We all have a serious problem when the rich use their money to buy government. But if the up coming Supreme Court case McCutcheon vs FEC that threatens to make the political system even more corruption if the judges rules in favor of McCutcheon. 
The Supreme Court is on the brink of doubling down on the Citizens United decision’s shameful legacy. If the Court sides with the plantiff in McCutcheon v. FEC and overturns aggregate contribution limits, a single indivudual could spend as much as $3.6 million on a single election — enough to buy the attention of the President and every single member of Congress. 
Our current contribution limits don’t threaten anyone’s speech; today’s donors can give over $120,000, more than twice what the average American family makes in a year. McCutcheon would add to a string of rulings that have enabled a few wealthy superdonors to buy as much influence as they can afford — shutting the rest of us out in the process. 
A bad decision in McCutcheon would put the court’s seal of approval on a system on a system of legalized bribery. It would underscore the compelling case for a constitutional amendment making it clear that Congress and the states can limit campaign spending. 
Source: Common Cause

#getmoneyout - We all have a serious problem when the rich use their money to buy government. But if the up coming Supreme Court case McCutcheon vs FEC that threatens to make the political system even more corruption if the judges rules in favor of McCutcheon.

The Supreme Court is on the brink of doubling down on the Citizens United decision’s shameful legacy. If the Court sides with the plantiff in McCutcheon v. FEC and overturns aggregate contribution limits, a single indivudual could spend as much as $3.6 million on a single election — enough to buy the attention of the President and every single member of Congress.

Our current contribution limits don’t threaten anyone’s speech; today’s donors can give over $120,000, more than twice what the average American family makes in a year. McCutcheon would add to a string of rulings that have enabled a few wealthy superdonors to buy as much influence as they can afford — shutting the rest of us out in the process.

A bad decision in McCutcheon would put the court’s seal of approval on a system on a system of legalized bribery. It would underscore the compelling case for a constitutional amendment making it clear that Congress and the states can limit campaign spending.

Source: Common Cause


Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus

Notes

  1. sckawtt reblogged this from occupywatchdog
  2. paszmina reblogged this from occupywatchdog
  3. littleleeny reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  4. ocoolstorybro reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  5. a-beanr reblogged this from caramelwinter
  6. ginsegn reblogged this from cielbunnyhive
  7. cielbunnyhive reblogged this from caramelwinter
  8. caramelwinter reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  9. missfluffernutter reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  10. i-dont-need-anyone-now reblogged this from purgeparty
  11. dermoosealini reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  12. kp777 reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  13. bandmail reblogged this from thequeenandthephoenixlives
  14. oldparasitesingle reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  15. beardoforange reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  16. marcohasamagicaltongue reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  17. thequeenandthephoenixlives reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  18. thecallgirlofcthulhu reblogged this from satanic-capitalist
  19. satanic-capitalist reblogged this from occupywatchdog and added:
    This sums up my whole blog
  20. zookmurnig reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  21. amaranthineinadream reblogged this from cuntwarrior
  22. ohhunism reblogged this from shinee-on-you